The issue of cultural imperialism has become very
popular in the world, but first what is the meaning of cultural imperialism? Cultural
imperialism is seen as the tool to promote a more powerful culture over a least
known or desirable culture. The essence of cultural imperialism is achieving
the domination of one nation over other nations; cultural sources of power and
influence are of key importance (Hamelink, 2007) .
In this twentieth century, drastic developments of
global media corporations have facilitated an easier access in exchanging
information, images, and text on a global scale. This can create an easier way
for a powerful nation to promote their culture around the world. The easiest
example for this case would be America. Many culture around the world are
gradually disappearing due to the influence of American culture. The
motivations behind American cultural imperialism are the desire for access to
foreign markets and the beliefs in the superiority of American culture(Galeiota, 2004) .
How does America convince the superiority of its
culture to the world? The answers are with marketing and media. Marketers
create an idea and image through media to promote, advertise and sell the
product and services to audiences. They have successfully make majority of consumers
around the world perceive America as a “land of cool”, thus they consume a lot
of American products and services, such as Nike shoes, Levis Jeans, and
McDonald.
Another reason why American culture becomes very
popular in the world is because of the innovation. TV broadcasting and movies
are good example for this. Since 1950s American TV networks created diverse new
TV program types including game shows, soap operas, reality show, situation
comedies (Sit-coms) that are exported internationally. Sex and the City, Heroes
and American Idol are the examples of American shows that become international
best sellers. American movies also give a strong influence toward the audience,
for example by hearing the word “Hollywood”, audiences will conjure up visions
of great motion pictures, Oscar nights, and glamour life of the celebrities. All this things
spread “American Dreams” or American way of life which is a dream of a land in
which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with
opportunity for each according to ability or achievement (The American Dream, 2012) , that influence
the audiences worldwide to pursue their own dreams and hopes for a better life.
In contrast with cultural imperialism, there is another
term that called Cultural proximity. According to Staubhaar, cultural proximity
is the tendency to
prefer media products from one’s own culture or the most similar possible
culture, because of the greater familiarity in terms of language and culture.
This happens in Mexico, Brazil, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, India, Dubai,
and South Africa, which continue to emerge their regional media production to
compete with US media production. They produce entertainments that are close as
possible in language, ethnic appearance, dress, style, and humor to resonate
their influence toward the audiences. For example Chilean audience member would
prefer content produced in Mexico rather than content produced in the United
States.
![]() |
| Bollywood instead of Hollywood? |
The government of some countries, such as France, China, Cuba, Canada, and
Iran has attempted to ease off America’s culture influence by limiting their
access through media. However, it seems not right for the government to limit
the citizens from gaining information because, every people has the right to seek,
receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers
(The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 2013) . The
government has to find another way to preserve their native culture without
compromise the human rights.
In the end, response of the audience towards cultural
imperialism and proximity will be different between one another. It’s up to us
to choose whether we want to let another culture dominate and gradually disappearing
our culture or we want to preserve our native culture by limiting our access to
another culture or maybe we can choose and freely pick the culture and adopt it
to the way we want to live by.
Bibliography
America's Cultural Role in the World Today. (2008).
Retrieved from ACCESS to International English:
http://access-internationalvg2.cappelendamm.no/c951212/artikkel/vis.html?tid=385685
Galeiota, J. (2004). Cultural Imperialism: An American
Tradition.
Hamelink, C. J. (2007). Cultural
Imperialism. Retrieved from www.sagepub.com:
http://www.sagepub.com/ritzerintro/study/materials/reference/77708_4.2ref.pdf
Ksiazek, T. B., & Webster, J. G. (2008, September).
Cultural Proximity and Audience Behaviour: The Role of Language in Patterns
of Polarization and Multicultural Fluency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media .
The American
Dream. (2012). Retrieved from Library of Congress:
http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/lessons/american-dream/students/thedream.html
The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.un.org:
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/




Hi Febiola,
ReplyDeleteI sense that you are arguing that we should be "free to choose" which "culture" to adopt in our daily lives. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
What do you think is the ideal (political) environment for this to happen? What policies (broadly) should be in place?
And what's your comment on heritage and traditional art forms or architecture? Should they be protected and promoted or should they be left to compete with "modern" and "western" influences?
-Zhen Hui